At first glance, the firing of a manager so quickly into his tenure, especially one where the expectation level was admittedly low, seems harsh and rushed. The natural reaction is to look at the Sveum firing as a scapegoat decision, placing the blame of an especially difficult two years of losing on Sveum. The firing would in turn, the theory goes, give the Cubs some positive momentum and hope heading into next year, fresh off the heels of the worst attendance the club has seen in over a decade. That might make sense, especially in the political arena that Chicago is, if the man in charge wasn't Theo Epstein.
Epstein has proven time and time again that every decision he makes is geared towards achieving the long term vision of the Cubs as quickly as possible. That long term vision, explained from the moment he arrived, was to stockpile young talent, develop it, and then complement that young talent in free agency to build a consistent winning ballclub. Theo would do this through the draft, through trades with existing assets, and as we have seen, in the international market. He's been remarkably successful thus far, with the minor league portion of the organization as strong now as it ever has been. The key would be to take the existing young talent on the roster, especially Starlin Castro and Anthony Rizzo, and build around them with young talent and after-acquired free agents.
Sveum meets the media after his firing |
If you look at the two prime examples, Castro and Rizzo, it is clear that Sveum took a major step backwards in the development of the two supposed cornerstones. I'm sure there are many more examples of a failure to develop, but these two are glaring. Of course, it isn't all on Sveum, but there were no minor setbacks. Castro's line this year, in his second season with Sveum, was a horrid .245 batting average, .284 on base percentage, only 10 home runs, and a baffling 44 RBI. More than that he struck out an alarming 129 times and only had 9 stolen bases. Each one of these categories is a major step down. As for Rizzo, he only hit 23 home runs, hit .233 with a .323 on base percentage and struck out 127 times. He only played in 87 games for the Cubs in 2012 and yet still had an obviously better season.
Castro's regression could have played a major role |
My feeling is that Theo, who is good personal friends with Dale, didn't want to take the chance. Surely he can't pin all of the Cubs failures, even those of Castro and Rizzo, on Sveum. But he knew that the future of the Cubs and his vision, was at stake. The team is at a point right now where the right coaching staff is key. This is a turning point in the organization's future and if Epstein & Co. didn't feel like Sveum was the man for the job, if they had even one shred of doubt, then it was the right decision to make.
The search likely begins with Girardi |
At this point, there's no limit to who they may pursue, especially considering the emphasis Epstein seemed to put on an manager with experience. If I was him, I'd contact the Tampa Rays and inquire about Joe Maddon too. Make them say no. Take a look at respected assistant coaches, like Mike Maddux in Texas, but focus on hiring a manager who has experience and success in this area. We're insulated and beaten down by the losing on the North Side, but the job is looked at nationally as an extremely attractive one. You'll get top level front office support, a supportive owner, and a farm system loaded with talent now and always acquiring more. To be the man who finally brings consistent winning, and dare I say, a World Series, to Wrigley Field is something that speaks to everyone in the game. Just ask Theo Epstein.
I'm still digesting this firing. I liked Sveum, and felt that given time he might have a chance here. you feel for a guy who obviously cared and gave it his all. Even Epstein talked about how difficult this decision was, and said that he felt Dale would be successful in the future. But this far into Theo's tenure, he's made many more good moves than bad. I've learned to trust his decision making. Sure, he was the one who decided to hire Dale Sveum, a decision that is now obviously to the front office a bad one. But just as quickly as he hired him, he's now making the right decision to fire him.
Thinking about it further, I totally understand his logic: if right now, at this point, you don't feel Sveum is the right man for the job, fire him and find the right man for the job. The stakes of finally establishing a winning culture with the Cubs are more important that giving a manager you don't have confidence in time to prove himself. All this does is make the future that much more exciting. Better get used to this Cubs fans. This is what it feels like to have the right guy in charge.
0 comments:
Post a Comment